VS

Home > SKI Bindings > Comparison

Compare Rossignol FKS 180 Ski Bindings VS Rossignol Axial 2 120 XL Ski Bindings
 
 
Add another Item to this comparison  Add Item

Overview:

There are 16 differences and 9 similarities between Rossignol FKS 180 Ski Bindings, Rossignol Axial 2 120 XL Ski Bindings
 
Specifications
Category   Downhill vs   Downhill  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Category”

Product ID   227,570 vs   227,574  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Product ID”

Shipping Restriction   This Item Is Not Available For Shipment Outside Of The United States. vs   This Item Is Not Available For Shipment Outside Of The United States.  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Shipping Restriction”

Actual Din Range   8-18 vs   3.5-12  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Actual Din Range”

Max Din Setting   
18
vs   12
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Max Din Setting”

Recommended Weight Range   170lbs+ vs   100-220lbs  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Recommended Weight Range”

Housing Material   Composite Metal vs   Composite  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Housing Material”

Binding Weight   5lbs 6oz vs   Not Specified  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Binding Weight”

Race   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Race”

Additional Details   25mm Of Elastic Travel, 4 Points Of Contact On The Toe, 3 Points Of Contact On The Heel, Heel Piece Rotates With The Boot Directly Under The Tibia, Short Mounting Platform Give Your Ski A Deeper More Consistent Flex, 180 Degree Release In The Toe, 40mm Of Lateral Travel, 72mm Afd, 0 Ramp Angle, Wide Mounting Zone vs   Four Points Of Contact On The Toe, 180 Degree Multi Directional Release, 45mm Of Lateral Travel, 25mm Of Elastic Travel, High Forward Pressure, Strong Power Transmission, Wide Mounting Zone  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Additional Details”

Add Comment about “Specifications

cancel
Description
Description 1   25mm Of Elastic Travel vs   Four Points Of Contact On The Toe  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Description 1”

Description 2   4 Points Of Contact On The Toe vs   180 Degree Multi Directional Release  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Description 2”

Description 3   3 Points Of Contact On The Heel vs   45mm Of Lateral Travel  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Description 3”

Description 4   Heel Piece Rotates With The Boot Directly Under The Tibia vs   25mm Of Elastic Travel  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Description 4”

Description 5   Short Mounting Platform Give Your Ski A Deeper More Consistent Flex vs   High Forward Pressure  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Description 5”

Description 6   180 Degree Release In The Toe vs   Strong Power Transmission  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Description 6”

Description 7   40mm Of Lateral Travel vs   Wide Mounting Zone  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Description 7”

Description 8   72mm Afd vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Description 8”

Description 9   0 Ramp Angle vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Description 9”

Description 10   Wide Mounting Zone vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Description 10”

Add Comment about “Description

cancel
General
Brand   Rossignol vs   Rossignol  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Brand”

Model Year   2013 vs   2013  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Model Year”

Gender   Mens vs   Mens  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Gender”

Type   Downhill vs   Downhill  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Type”

warranty   One Year vs   One Year  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “warranty”

Add Comment about “General

cancel

Compare Rossignol FKS 180 Ski Bindings vs Rossignol Axial 2 120 XL Ski Bindings SKI Bindings


Scroll To Top

saved