VS

Home > SKI Bindings > Comparison

Compare Atomic Tracker 16 S Ski Bindings VS Rossignol FKS 180 Ski Bindings
 
 
Add another Item to this comparison  Add Item

Overview:

There are 19 differences and 6 similarities between Atomic Tracker 16 S Ski Bindings, Rossignol FKS 180 Ski Bindings
 
Specifications
Category   Alpine Touring vs   Downhill  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Category”

Product ID   275,921 vs   227,570  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Product ID”

Shipping Restriction    vs   This Item Is Not Available For Shipment Outside Of The United States.  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Shipping Restriction”

Actual Din Range   7-16 vs   8-18  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Actual Din Range”

Max Din Setting   
16
vs   18
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Max Din Setting”

Recommended Weight Range   150+ Lbs vs   170lbs+  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Recommended Weight Range”

Housing Material   Composite Metal vs   Composite Metal  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Housing Material”

Binding Weight   2.93 Kg/pair vs   5lbs 6oz  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Binding Weight”

Race   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Race”

Additional Details   Sm Fits Boot Soles 265-320, Tool Less Switch From Hike To Ride, Adjustable Sole Height, Low Profile Chassis, 80 Mm Base Platform, Din Alpine Norm, Two Climbing Positions, 90 Degree Toe Rotation vs   25mm Of Elastic Travel, 4 Points Of Contact On The Toe, 3 Points Of Contact On The Heel, Heel Piece Rotates With The Boot Directly Under The Tibia, Short Mounting Platform Give Your Ski A Deeper More Consistent Flex, 180 Degree Release In The Toe, 40mm Of Lateral Travel, 72mm Afd, 0 Ramp Angle, Wide Mounting Zone  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Additional Details”

Add Comment about “Specifications

cancel
Description
Description 1   Sm Fits Boot Soles 265-320 vs   25mm Of Elastic Travel  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Description 1”

Description 2   Tool Less Switch From Hike To Ride vs   4 Points Of Contact On The Toe  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Description 2”

Description 3   Adjustable Sole Height vs   3 Points Of Contact On The Heel  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Description 3”

Description 4   Low Profile Chassis vs   Heel Piece Rotates With The Boot Directly Under The Tibia  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Description 4”

Description 5   80 Mm Base Platform vs   Short Mounting Platform Give Your Ski A Deeper More Consistent Flex  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Description 5”

Description 6   Din Alpine Norm vs   180 Degree Release In The Toe  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Description 6”

Description 7   Two Climbing Positions vs   40mm Of Lateral Travel  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Description 7”

Description 8   90 Degree Toe Rotation vs   72mm Afd  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Description 8”

Description 9    vs   0 Ramp Angle  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Description 9”

Description 10    vs   Wide Mounting Zone  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Description 10”

Add Comment about “Description

cancel
General
Brand   Atomic vs   Rossignol  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Brand”

Model Year   2013 vs   2013  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Model Year”

Gender   Mens vs   Mens  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Gender”

Type   Alpine Touring vs   Downhill  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Type”

warranty   One Year vs   One Year  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “warranty”

Add Comment about “General

cancel

Compare Atomic Tracker 16 S Ski Bindings vs Rossignol FKS 180 Ski Bindings SKI Bindings


Scroll To Top

saved