Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
Specifications
Category
Downhill
vs
Downhill
Product ID
275,916
vs
227,571
Shipping Restriction
vs
This Item Is Not Available For Shipment Outside Of The United States.
Actual Din Range
4-12
vs
5-14
Max Din Setting
12
vs
14
Recommended Weight Range
100-200 Lbs
vs
>130 Lbs
Housing Material
Composite
vs
Composite Metal
Binding Weight
2.10 Kg/pair
vs
4.6 lbs
Race
No
vs
No
Additional Details
Automatic Toe Wing Adjustment, Lightweight, Accommodates Adult Boot Sole Norms
vs
Seven Contact Points Between The Boot And Binding, Short Mounting Zone Give The Ski Deeper, More Consistent Flex, 25mm Of Elastic Travel, Heel Piece Rotates Directly Under The Tibia, 72mm Afd, 0.5 Degrees Of Ramp Angle, Wide Mounting Zone, 40mm Of Lateral Travel
Description
Description 1
Automatic Toe Wing Adjustment
vs
Seven Contact Points Between The Boot And Binding
Description 2
Lightweight
vs
Short Mounting Zone Give The Ski Deeper, More Consistent Flex
Description 3
Accommodates Adult Boot Sole Norms
vs
25mm Of Elastic Travel
Description 4
vs
Heel Piece Rotates Directly Under The Tibia
Description 5
vs
72mm Afd
Description 6
vs
0.5 Degrees Of Ramp Angle
Description 7
vs
Wide Mounting Zone
Description 8
vs
40mm Of Lateral Travel
General
Brand
Atomic
vs
Rossignol
Model Year
2013
vs
2013
Gender
Mens
vs
Mens
Type
Downhill
vs
Downhill
warranty
One Year
vs
One Year
Compare Atomic FFG 12 Ski Bindings vs Rossignol FKS 140 Ski Bindings SKI Bindings
cancel